Bitget App
Trade smarter
MarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Pressure UC Through Funding

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Pressure UC Through Funding

Bitget-RWA2025/11/15 21:36
By:Bitget-RWA

- A federal judge blocked Trump's plan to defund UC over antisemitism claims, citing First and Tenth Amendment violations. - The $1.2B funding demand and civil rights investigations were deemed coercive tactics to suppress "woke" academic views. - UC warned the financial threat would devastate its research programs, while critics called the strategy authoritarian. - The ruling preserves UC's funding but leaves unresolved tensions over government influence in higher education.

A federal judge has halted the Trump administration’s efforts to withdraw funding from the University of California (UC) system, determining that the attempt to punish the university over claims of antisemitism and discrimination breaches constitutional rights. On November 15, 2025, U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco granted a preliminary injunction, stopping the administration from levying penalties or suspending federal grants without proper legal procedures. She described the move as part of a larger initiative to eliminate “woke,” “left-leaning,” and “socialist” perspectives from the nation’s top universities

. This ruling represents a major blow to the Trump administration’s strategy of using financial threats to pressure universities into adopting conservative values.

The administration’s campaign began in the summer of 2025, when it demanded that UC pay $1.2 billion to regain access to frozen research funds,

.
Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Pressure UC Through Funding image 0
This demand was part of a broader pattern targeting prestigious schools, with similar measures taken against Columbia University and other private institutions. Judge Lin concluded that the administration’s practice—initiating civil rights probes to justify funding cuts—amounted to “coercive and retaliatory actions that violate the First and Tenth Amendments” . She noted that UC faculty had presented “substantial evidence” of a systematic attempt to undermine academic freedom, with some scholars reportedly avoiding research topics considered “too leftist or woke” .

The decision highlights ongoing friction between the Trump administration and higher education, a frequent target of conservative scrutiny. The administration has criticized diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives as unfair, claiming they disadvantage white and Asian American students. In October 2025, officials offered a contentious agreement to nine universities,

. Although UC was not part of this proposal, the broader approach reflects an effort to reshape academia through financial influence.

UC President James B. Milliken cautioned that the $1.2 billion demand would severely harm the system,

. The administration’s settlement offers also aimed to limit international student enrollment based on “anti-Western” or “anti-American” beliefs and . Judge Lin’s order specifically prohibited these requirements, stating they violate constitutional protections.

The case has sparked strong opposition from advocacy organizations and Democratic leaders. California Governor Gavin Newsom warned that universities accepting the administration’s terms would lose state support, while Democracy Forward, a progressive legal advocacy group,

. The administration has not yet commented on the ruling, but its broader agenda—including efforts to reduce federal agencies and alter social policy, such as cutting Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood and targeting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—demonstrates a consistent use of fiscal measures to pursue ideological objectives .

With the injunction in effect, the UC system has avoided an immediate financial crisis but still faces ongoing risks. The administration’s campaign against universities, presented as a defense of free speech, has instead ignited debates about academic independence and the government’s influence over education. As the legal battle continues, the outcome may set a precedent for resolving federal funding disputes—and determine whether universities can withstand politically driven financial pressure.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

You may also like

Bitcoin News Today: Bitcoin Faces $62K Drop Threat Amid Fed's Data Silence Predicament

- Bitcoin faces $62K crash risk amid Fed uncertainty caused by U.S. government shutdown's "data blackout" disrupting inflation/labor data. - Post-Nov 13 reopening saw BTC rebound above $102K, but markets remain fragile with 20% decline from October peak despite $140B ETF growth. - Fed rate cut odds dropped to 52% for December, creating volatility as institutions like Harvard Endowment invest $443M in Bitcoin ETFs. - U.S. miners struggle with 37.75% global hashrate share amid lack of federal incentives, con

Bitget-RWA2025/11/16 05:30
Bitcoin News Today: Bitcoin Faces $62K Drop Threat Amid Fed's Data Silence Predicament

Bitcoin Updates Now: Crypto Faces a Standstill as Market Anxiety Meets Harvard’s Confident Bitcoin Investment

- Alternative Data's Fear & Greed Index hit record low 10 on Nov 16, signaling extreme crypto market fear and frozen investor sentiment. - Bitcoin fell 5% to $96,000 while CD20 lost 5.8% as profit-taking, liquidations, and liquidity declines accelerated selloffs. - Rising U.S. Treasury yields and central bank uncertainty worsened losses, with Nansen noting "perfect storm" of macro risks and institutional outflows. - Harvard's $443M IBIT ETF investment contrasts current bearishness, highlighting diverging i

Bitget-RWA2025/11/16 05:30
Bitcoin Updates Now: Crypto Faces a Standstill as Market Anxiety Meets Harvard’s Confident Bitcoin Investment

XRP News Today: XRP ETF Achieves Historic Debut Despite Crypto Market Downturn

- Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) set 2025's debut record with $58.6M trading volume, surpassing Bitwise's Solana ETF . - XRPC attracted $245M inflows despite XRP's 5.2% price drop, highlighting institutional demand vs. spot market dynamics. - SEC's 2025 Ripple settlement enabled first U.S. spot XRP ETF, signaling regulatory clarity after 5-year legal battle. - Analysts predict $8B in potential inflows for XRPC, with XRP price targets up to $10 in 18 months. - XRPC's success reflects maturing crypto ETF market, with

Bitget-RWA2025/11/16 05:30

BCH Shares Fell by 0.3% Amid Increasing Institutional Holdings and Lower-than-Expected Earnings

- BCH shares fell 0.3% in 24 hours amid mixed institutional buying and earnings shortfalls, despite a 185.3% stake increase by Campbell & CO to 26,095 shares. - Q3 earnings of $0.60 (vs. $0.62 expected) and revenue of $675. 3M (vs. $832M forecast) highlighted underperformance, though 23.25% ROE and 32.87% net margin signaled strong profitability. - Analysts upgraded BCH to "Moderate Buy" with $34 average target, citing Goldman Sachs ($35) and JPMorgan ($33) price hikes, reflecting cautious optimism about l

Bitget-RWA2025/11/16 05:22