Precio de TRUMP MAGA SUPERTRUMP

The SMA100 bearish crossover may signal a structural reset instead of a prolonged downside. TON, ENA, PEPE, APT, and TRUMP each show distinct strength despite the signal. Current conditions favor observation of structure rather than directional certainty. The cryptocurrency market is reacting to a technical signal that often appears before meaningful trend shifts. A bearish crossover of the 100-day simple moving average (SMA100) has emerged across several major altcoins. While such crossovers are traditionally associated with weakness, historical market cycles show that when this pattern forms after prolonged consolidation, it can signal a structural reset rather than sustained downside. Current data shows muted volatility, stable liquidity, and controlled price behavior, which separates this setup from panic-driven declines. Analysts note that in past cycles, similar SMA100 crossovers marked the early stages of accumulation before broader bullish expansions. This context has pushed market observers to focus on individual altcoins that continue to show exceptional stability, outstanding volume behavior, and resilient technical structures despite the crossover. Toncoin (TON) Shows Exceptional Network-Driven Stability Toncoin is displaying a remarkable ability to maintain price structure near its medium-term averages. Despite the SMA100 crossover, TON’s trading range remains narrow, suggesting sellers are not in control. On-chain activity remains steady, which supports a view of organic participation rather than speculative churn. Analysts describe TON’s structure as superior compared with peers, as it continues to respect key demand zones. This behavior often aligns with early accumulation phases during broader market resets. Ethena (ENA) Reflects Outstanding Liquidity Discipline Ethena has shown outstanding consistency in volume following the SMA100 signal. Price action has remained orderly, with no sharp breakdowns or aggressive rebounds. This reflects disciplined positioning by market participants. ENA’s ability to absorb selling pressure without expanding volatility is viewed as a positive structural trait. Analysts highlight this as a potentially lucrative setup if broader market sentiment improves. Pepe (PEPE) Maintains Remarkable Liquidity Retention Pepe, often categorized as high-risk, has demonstrated a phenomenal capacity to retain liquidity during pullbacks. Despite its speculative nature, PEPE has avoided disorderly selling. Market data shows repeated defenses of short-term support zones. This unmatched behavior among similar tokens suggests sustained interest, though analysts stress that volatility risk remains elevated. Aptos (APT) Holds a Groundbreaking Technical Base Aptos continues to trade within a well-defined range, even as the SMA100 crossover persists. The token’s price structure reflects a revolutionary improvement in stability compared with earlier cycles. Analysts point to declining downside momentum as a sign that selling pressure may be exhausting. APT’s current behavior is considered a dynamic setup rather than a confirmed reversal. TRUMP Token Displays Unparalleled Short-Term Market Engagement The TRUMP token remains speculative but has shown unparalleled short-term liquidity engagement. Price reactions around support levels have been controlled, indicating active participation rather than abandonment. While risk remains high, analysts note that such behavior often appears during early market repositioning phases. Tags: Altcoin APT Crypto market cryptocurrency ENA TON

$TRUMP is like scam coin , this coin has potential can go upto 100$ ?

BlockBeats News, December 26th, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale deposited 3 million TRUMP tokens worth $14.88 million into Binance after holding them for about 50 days, suffering a loss of $7.8 million. The whale's initial cost was $22.68 million.

The year 2026 is poised to be a critical juncture for cryptocurrency regulations in the United States. Industry representatives estimate a 50-60% chance that a comprehensive law governing digital assets will be passed before the midterm elections. Although negotiations between Republicans and Democrats show promise, significant issues remain, primarily due to the intricate structure involving banking, securities, and commodities laws. Different drafts prepared by two Senate committees need to be combined and aligned with the Clarity bill, which has already passed the House of Representatives. Contents Key Points of Disagreement in the Draft Time Pressure and Election Season Concerns Key Points of Disagreement in the Draft Several core issues stand out in the cryptocurrency market structure draft that require resolution. Serious disagreements persist over how banks and cryptocurrency companies should regulate profit-generating stablecoins. Banking organizations argue that the GENIUS stablecoin legislation enacted over the summer is not comprehensive enough and fails to prevent issuers from offering interest on stablecoins. In contrast, cryptocurrency advocates assert that the ability of stablecoins to offer returns represents fair competition. Regulating decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols in terms of anti-money laundering and determining whether some coins fall under the jurisdiction of the SEC or the CFTC are among the contentious topics. Cody Carbone, CEO of the Digital Chamber, expresses concern over the SEC’s decision-making role, indicating it could signify a return to the critical approach seen during former SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s tenure. Additionally, President Donald Trump’s conflicts of interest within the cryptocurrency sector further complicate the legislative process. The Trump family has reportedly profited approximately $620 million through the World Liberty Financial project, a 20% stake in the American Bitcoin mining company, and meme coins named TRUMP and MELANIA. The shortage of commissioners at the CFTC, which emerged after four members resigned last year, has strengthened the Democrats’ position in the negotiations, leaving only one Republican commissioner. Carbone highlights that no senator would want to grant such extensive authority to a small agency meant to have a five-member commission. Time Pressure and Election Season Concerns The Senate Banking Committee plans to initiate the markup process at the beginning of the year, with progress reported in negotiations with Democrats. The committee’s spokesperson stated that Chairman Scott has made significant bipartisan progress on digital asset market structure regulations. For the bill to become law, the versions from the Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees must be merged, approved by the full Senate, and aligned with the Clarity bill that has passed the House of Representatives. Kevin Wysocki, head of policy at Anchorage Digital, emphasizes that lawmakers need to act within the first two quarters of next year, or else they risk focusing on election issues. Carbone expresses concern over the lack of markup in January committees and mentions optimism if he sees markup in both committees, a reconciliation bill in the Senate, and potentially a full Senate vote within the next six weeks. As midterm elections approach, Trump’s cryptocurrency conflicts of interest could become increasingly prominent. Rebecca Liao, CEO of Saga, notes that Democratic messaging is focused on affordability and that privileged gains by the president or those in his administration will continually be criticized. Following the 43-day shutdown ending in November, Congress temporarily funded the government through January 30, 2026, but another shutdown is possible if a new agreement is not reached. Liao emphasizes that even if comprehensive cryptocurrency legislation is not enacted in 2026, action is necessary. As financial institutions enter the cryptocurrency space, regulatory clarity is essential for cryptocurrencies to achieve genuine adoption and widespread use.