UNICORN Tokenの‌価格UNI

Uniswap Community Proposes "Uniswap Launch Fee Switch" Temperature Check Proposal

Uniswap Community Proposes "Uniswap Launch Fee Switch" Sanity Check Proposal

Whale 0x3136 just surrendered after 5 Years After holding 512,440 $UNI ($3.64M) for nearly 5 years, whale 0x3136 finally sent all of it back to Binance, realizing a huge $11.64M loss (-76%). They originally withdrew the same stack in April 2021 for $15.28M at $29.83 avg. Meanwhile, the whale Still Holds a Monster Portfolio: 🔹 60.2M USDT 🔹 18.28M $GRT ($914K) 🔹 4.26M $REQ ($470K) 🔹 274,836 TON ($415K) 🔹 11.15M CHZ ($313K)

For years, Uniswap has been the quiet backbone of decentralized finance — the protocol that never chases hype, never bends to market noise, and never appears desperate for attention. It simply exists at the center of the ecosystem, moving trillions in volume while ignoring the theatrics that surround it. But the last four weeks have cracked that aura of invincibility. The broader DeFi market is undergoing one of its sharpest liquidity contractions since the LUNA collapse, and Uniswap — normally the most resilient protocol in a crisis — is finally feeling the pressure. Its liquidity pools are thinning, its market share is drifting downward, and its once-impenetrable moat now shows hairline fractures. The numbers are not catastrophic, but they are impossible to ignore. --- A Market Losing the Depth That Once Defined It DeFi’s total value locked (TVL) has slid from over $171B at its yearly peak to roughly $112B, wiping more than $59B in a slow but relentless exodus. Uniswap’s pools aren’t immune: Liquidity across major trading pairs is shrinking. LPs (liquidity providers) are withdrawing capital at a steady pace. Impermanent loss is hitting harder during volatile drawdowns. Incentive programs on competing chains are siphoning liquidity away. This isn’t a collapse — it’s erosion. A month ago, traders on Uniswap could move size without blinking. Now, even large-cap assets show slippage creeping upward. That is the first sign of strain in an AMM-driven ecosystem. --- What’s Causing the Liquidity Crunch? Three macro-level drivers explain the shift: 1. Risk-Off Sentiment Across Crypto When Bitcoin corrects aggressively, LPs de-risk. Pools on automated market makers are the first place capital exits because: Impermanent loss increases in fast-moving markets Yields drop as swap volume decreases Liquidity mining incentives rarely offset volatility LPs know this drill — they’ve seen it every cycle. 2. Competing DEX Incentives Are Getting Smarter Protocols on newer chains have learned something important: liquidity is mobile. Sui, Base, Solana, and Blast have rolled out targeted incentive programs that appeal directly to LPs who prefer dynamic yield sources. Uniswap, by design, doesn’t play the “emissions” game — but in 2025, that means it risks losing competitiveness in the short term. 3. The UNI Value Capture Overhaul Is Still in Transition Uniswap’s fee-switch transformation, buy-and-burn model, and new governance structure have turned UNI from a dormant governance token into a quasi-equity instrument. The problem? Liquidity providers are still recalculating yields under the new model. Some are waiting for clearer ROI data before they redeploy size. This is the cost of evolution. --- The Critical Problem: Reduced Depth = Increased Volatility Uniswap’s brand was built on one promise: deep liquidity, any time, any asset. But when TVL drops and LPs exit: Slippage for large trades increases Arbitrageurs become more aggressive Price impact amplifies during thin order windows Bots redirect volume to competing DEXs Retail traders lose faith in stable pricing A decentralized exchange can survive reduced volume. It cannot survive reduced depth. Depth is what keeps swaps smooth, passive income predictable, and arbitrage profitable. Without depth, the AMM model breaks its illusion of stability. --- The Bigger Picture: DeFi Is Growing Up, and the Market Is Repricing Risk The liquidity issue isn’t just Uniswap’s problem — it’s DeFi’s coming-of-age moment. Protocols are no longer competing on idealism or community narratives. They are competing on: real yield execution speed slippage control institutional-grade routing security regulatory alignment multi-chain interoperability DeFi is industrializing. The playground era is ending. In that transition, Uniswap is forced to operate differently than it has for four years. --- Is This a Temporary Dip or the Start of a Structural Shift? As a market analyst looking at on-chain flows, the picture is nuanced: Temporary Factors (Likely to Reverse) Bitcoin’s correction ETF-driven outflows Volatility causing LP withdrawals Risk-off macro sentiment Liquidity tends to come back once markets stabilize. Structural Factors (Long-Term Threats) Rising competition from optimized AMMs Concentrated liquidity models becoming standard Chains offering native DEX incentives Uni’s governance overhaul taking time to settle Real-world assets attracting more capital than DEX pools These forces won’t disappear — Uniswap must adapt. --- The Key Question: What Happens Next? If LPs regain confidence, depth will return quickly. If they don’t, Uniswap risks losing the one advantage it cannot replace. But here’s what most analysts are missing: Uniswap does not need to win on incentives — it needs to win on infrastructure. And with its fee-switch overhaul, value-capture reforms, and impending upgrades to routing and oracle systems, it is positioning itself to become the base layer of on-chain liquidity, not just another DEX. This phase is not a collapse. It’s a recalibration. --- Conclusion — The Most Important Moment Since Uniswap V3 Uniswap has weathered every storm in DeFi’s short but turbulent history. But this liquidity contraction is different because it's not driven by fear — it's driven by competition and by the ecosystem’s transformation. If Uniswap navigates this period correctly, it will emerge stronger, leaner, and more aligned with what DeFi in 2025 demands: efficiency, resilience, and institutional-grade liquidity. If it miscalculates, the market will not hesitate to crown a new king.

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan says the market is overlooking a key trend: major tokens are rapidly improving value capture. UNI is moving toward a fee switch that would burn ~16% of trading fees, ETH’s Fusaka upgrade (expected Dec. 3) could 5–10x revenue by adding a minimum L2 data