Wen Lambo Financial priceWLFI

On Dec. 15, Elizabeth Warren put two names at the top of a letter that signals where she thinks US crypto policy is actually written: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Attorney General Pamela Bondi. The ask is simple on paper but awkward in practice. Are their departments investigating what she calls “national security risks” tied to decentralized exchanges, and if so, how far does that scrutiny go when the president’s business orbit is part of the story? The hook she chose is PancakeSwap, a DeFi venue that, in Warren’s telling, sits at the uncomfortable intersection of “no account needed” trading and the kind of money that can end up on sanctions slides. In the letter, she pointed to reporting that PancakeSwap has been used to launder cybercrime proceeds tied to North Korea. She then turned the compliance argument into a Washington fight, saying PancakeSwap has been “drumming up interest” in coins tied to the Trump family’s main crypto company, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), and citing a Wall Street Journal report claiming that over 90% of trades in USD1 took place on PancakeSwap. The cleanest way to read the letter is to ignore the rhetoric and look at the three questions at the end. She asked Treasury and DOJ to describe national security risks tied to DEXs (including PancakeSwap) and spell out gaps in statutory and regulatory authority that could be closed. She also wants lists of actions the agencies will take to prevent conflicts of interest and insulate enforcement and national security decisions from crypto-related conflicts, explicitly including “business ties to the Trump family.” She set a response deadline of Jan. 12, 2026. What Warren asked for and why PancakeSwap got named Warren’s choice of target matters because it’s a proxy for a bigger argument she’s made for years: if a service looks and behaves like a financial venue, regulators shouldn’t accept “but it’s decentralized” as a get-out-of-compliance card. Her press release makes that case bluntly, describing DEX activity at scale and arguing that platforms like PancakeSwap and Uniswap can move huge volumes without requiring users to register or provide identification. In her view, that lets users route around KYC expectations that apply elsewhere in finance. She also anchors the pitch to an illicit-finance example, pointing to North Korea-linked hackers and asserting that PancakeSwap was used to facilitate laundering tied to a major theft, with a dollar figure attached. You don’t have to buy every implication in that framing to see why it’s effective politics. The word PancakeSwap is sticky. It makes a sprawling argument about DeFi, sanctions, and AML feel like a single addressable problem, the way Enron and Lehman Brothers became shorthand in prior crises. It also lets her pose a question that Treasury and DOJ can’t answer comfortably in public. If they say they’re investigating, they risk disclosing sensitive enforcement posture. If they say no, they hand her a quote she can easily weaponize against crypto. Under the hood, the mechanics are messy in ways that are easy to miss. A decentralized exchange isn’t one company in one building. It’s a set of smart contracts, liquidity pools, routers, front ends, and wallet tooling that can be hosted, mirrored, geofenced, or forked. Enforcement can hit identifiable chokepoints, like a hosted front end or a developer entity, but you can’t shut PancakeSwap down with a single switch like you can freeze a bank account. That’s where Warren’s first two questions do real work. She’s not just asking whether they’re investigating. She’s asking for a catalog of risks and for a map of legal gaps, which is another way of saying: if the current toolkit doesn’t reach DeFi cleanly, tell Congress what to rewrite. It’s oversight as discovery, and it doubles as pre-writing the talking points for whatever legislative language comes next. The third question is the one that makes this letter more than a DeFi compliance scold. Warren is asking the agencies to explain how they’ll prevent political interference and conflicts tied to the Trump family’s business interests. That’s a demand for process guarantees, the kind that get invoked when the public doesn’t trust the referee. To be fair, there are serious counterpoints here, and they’re not trivial. First, DeFi is unusually transparent compared with traditional finance: flows are public, and sophisticated analytics can trace patterns quickly. Second, a lot of DEX activity is plain-vanilla trading by normal users, market makers, and arbitrageurs. Third, the industry has been experimenting with compliance tooling around protocols, including wallet screening, sanctions checks, and front-end controls. Whether you think that’s enough is a policy judgment, but it’s not accurate to treat DeFi as a lawless void with no ability to monitor anything. The deeper tension is that DeFi makes it easier for bad actors to move value without account creation, while also making it easier for everyone else to audit flows in real time. Warren leans hard on the first half, and her critics lean hard on the second. Both halves are true enough to keep this fight going. How a stalled bill can turn Warren's oversight mail into policy The timing of the letter is the plot twist. Congress is “considering crypto market structure legislation,” Warren writes, and that phrase does a lot of heavy lifting. In July, the House passed a market-structure bill that would build a federal framework for crypto and expand the CFTC’s oversight role, which the industry has wanted for years. Yet a House vote doesn’t resolve the Senate, and market-structure legislation is still stalled there, even as the broader attitude toward crypto has softened in other parts of government. This is why Warren’s “pressure-as-process” approach matters. When legislation drags, letters become leverage because they create a record, force responses, and shape the narrative that lawmakers use to justify a yes vote, a no vote, or a demand for carve-outs. You can see the continuity by looking one month back. On Nov. 17, Warren and Jack Reed wrote to Bessent and Bondi about World Liberty Financial and its governance token $WLFI. They cited reports that token sales reached buyers tied to sanctioned or illicit actors, and explicitly tied that issue to market-structure talks in Congress. The letter spends pages on the governance angle, arguing that token ownership can translate into influence, and it repeatedly returns to conflict questions tied to the Trump family’s financial interest in the project. Read together, the November WLFI letter and the December PancakeSwap letter form a two-part argument that’s hard to ignore if you’re a senator trying to use “responsible innovation” language without looking naïve. Part one says: a Trump-linked crypto venture may create a national-security risk via who buys in and who gets governance influence. Part two says: the trading venue that may concentrate liquidity for a Trump-linked coin is also the kind of DeFi rail that illicit actors can use. That doesn’t prove wrongdoing, and it doesn’t prove the Trump family is receiving special treatment. What it does is raise the political cost of writing a market-structure bill that goes light on DeFi or punts conflict safeguards to “later.” If you’re negotiating Senate text, Warren is essentially telling you that “later” will show up as a headline, and she’s pre-loading the headline. There’s also a pragmatic read if you assume nobody here is acting in bad faith. Even crypto-friendly lawmakers can look at DeFi and admit a basic problem: the US has a patchwork of AML expectations, and DEXs don’t fit cleanly into categories built for banks, brokers, and money transmitters. Warren is pushing the agencies to say, in plain English, whether their authority is enough, and if it’s not, what they’d want Congress to hand them. That’s a legitimate oversight function, even if you find her tone exhausting. The balanced takeaway is that Warren’s campaign can produce two very different outcomes, depending on how Congress and agencies react. One path is a narrowly tailored set of obligations that target interfaces, promoters, and identifiable intermediaries, while acknowledging that code isn’t a customer and a liquidity pool can’t file a SAR. The other path is broad, vague language that treats decentralization itself as suspicious, which would push activity offshore, encourage shadow front ends, and make it harder for US users to interact with the most liquid markets under US legal protections. Either way, the letter is a tactic that treats politics as infrastructure. When the Senate can’t get a bill across the finish line, the record becomes the battlefield, and Warren is trying to write the terrain in advance. The post Elizabeth Warren is using PancakeSwap to force Trump’s regulators into a conflict trap they can’t escape appeared first on CryptoSlate.

On Dec 17, India’s Competition Commission cleared Coinbase’s minority stake in CoinDCX, valuing the exchange at $2.45 billion and giving Coinbase direct access to one of the fastest-growing crypto markets on the planet. India and the Middle East together already count more than 100 million crypto users, and that number keeps climbing. For traders, moves like this matter because real adoption brings real volume. That’s why fresh Pepe coin price prediction chatter is picking up as traders watch which regions are actually onboarding users and pushing liquidity into the market. DeepSnitch AI is getting massive attention right now. Traders are hunting for tools that actually track adoption patterns and market expansion as they happen, and this delivers. The presale is pushing close to $1M raised, with tokens already sitting at 92% gains from launch. Smart money focused on 2026 adoption trends is piling in because it gives them the edge they need. Coinbase India bet signals massive adoption opportunity Coinbase dropping a $2.45 billion valuation on CoinDCX and planning fiat onramps for 2026 is absolutely massive for Pepe coin price prediction because when you bring 100 million crypto users across India and the Middle East into easy access markets, that capital doesn’t just sit in Bitcoin. These regions are known for high-risk, high-reward plays, and meme coins like Pepe get flooded with volume when new users start chasing gains. The fact that Coinbase is coming back after pulling out in 2023 shows the regulatory environment cleaned up enough for serious infrastructure investment, which means this isn’t a temporary pump. This is sustained onboarding infrastructure being built, and when Indian traders get rupee onramps in 2026, you’re looking at fresh capital flowing into the exact tokens that move fast and reward early positioning. DeepSnitch AI races toward $1M presale with January launch days away DeepSnitch AI is straight up flying right now, and the presale is about to smash through $1M raised while tokens are already banking 92% gains for anyone who got in early, which is wild considering exchange listings don’t even drop until January 2026. The crazy part is that three AI agents are already live and working, tracking exactly the kind of moves that print money like Coinbase, throwing $2.45 billion at India to tap 100 million users who are about to get direct fiat onramps into crypto markets. Most traders are out here trying to predict Pepe coin price prediction targets by staring at charts, but the real edge comes from seeing where the actual infrastructure is being built before everyone else figures it out, and the price has already moved. DeepSnitch catches these plays as they happen because it’s monitoring adoption patterns, exchange expansions, and regional growth metrics across every major market in real time. The bonus codes are absolutely insane right now because at $0.02903 per token, dropping $5,000 normally gets you around 172,235 tokens, which is already solid positioning. But when you stack the DSNTVIP100 code on top of that, you’re suddenly walking away with 344,471 tokens for that exact same $5,000, which means you’re literally doubling your bag for zero extra cash out of pocket. That’s twice the upside potential on the same investment, and these codes completely disappear on January 1st. PEPE coin price prediction for January 2026 As of December 20, PEPE is trading around $0.000004063 with strong daily trading volume and active market interest across major exchanges. Its all‑time high sits near $0.00002803, meaning current prices are more than 92% below those peaks, which traders often view as a deep discount entry while waiting for renewed market hype. Meme coins historically see big moves when retail FOMO returns, and PEPE’s size and recognition make it a coin traders watch for potential breakouts. Looking ahead to January 2026, several technical‌ price models suggest PEPE could trade within a range near $0.0000030 to $0.0000060 if market sentiment stabilizes and meme momentum returns. World Liberty Financial (WLFI) update for January 2026 WLFI is trading around $0.13 as of December 20. ATH is around $0.46, so the price is still down roughly 70% from peak, which is exactly the zone dip buyers and rotation traders like to stalk. It’s not dead, it’s just cooling while money cycles around the market. Heading into January 2026, WLFI is a pure narrative play. If headlines stay quiet, price probably chops between $0.10 and $0.20, just range trading and liquidity farming. But if political narratives heat up and retail starts sniffing again, traders are eyeing a push into the $0.25 to $0.35 zone, with wicks higher if FOMO hits. That’s a clean 2x+ from current levels if momentum flips. Conclusion Coinbase throwing $2.45B into India to chase 100M crypto users across India and the Middle East is a loud signal. This is a big exchange of money planting flags where adoption is actually ripping, not just talking. When moves like that happen, you’re watching the pipes get laid for serious liquidity to pour in later. With CoinDCX already rocking 20M users and Coinbase lining up fiat onramps for 2026, the setup is clear. More users plus easier money means volume goes up, narratives catch fire, and that’s exactly why traders start dialing up Pepe coin price prediction models and loading risk across the board. This is where DeepSnitch AI fits. It’s pushing toward $1M raised, tokens already up 92%, and it’s built to catch these adoption and infrastructure plays in real time while most traders are still reacting to charts. Get into the DeepSnitch AI presale, lock your bonus, and stay tapped into Telegram and X. The window is closing fast. Frequently asked questions What’s the latest Pepe coin price prediction right now? Right now traders looking at Pepe coin price prediction are eyeballing potential bounce zones near support and watching volume spikes for clues that a bigger move could be coming. How does the PEPE forecast look for 2026? The PEPE forecast is upbeat in trader circles, especially if meme season heats up again. If retail flows back in, this thing could wake up hard and surprise a lot of people. Can the Pepe coin price prediction hit new highs? Some bulls think so. Based on historical reaction during hype spikes, the Pepe coin price prediction could point to big gains if the next big wave hits and retail FOMO kicks in hard. Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is part of a sponsored post, press release, or paid content and is for promotional purposes only. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and exercise caution before making any decisions based on the content. Coinomedia does not endorse, guarantee, or take responsibility for the accuracy or reliability of the information, products, or services mentioned and will not be liable for any losses or damages incurred. Tags DeepSnitchAI PressRelease

World Liberty Financial‘s latest policy proposal envisions using up to 5% of unlocked WLFI token reserves to advance its USD1 stablecoin partnership, according to COINOTAG News on December 20. The plan underscores tokenomics-driven liquidity strategy and targeted incentive measures intended to strengthen the ecosystem’s long-run fundamentals. The proposal has ignited a community debate. Some holders warn that the proposed token expenditure could weigh on the WLFI price, impacting the roughly 80% of tokens that remain locked, while supporters contend that well-designed incentives can bolster long-term liquidity and network value. Context notes: World Liberty’s prior token sale raised about $550 million, but the WLFI price has declined by roughly 60% from its peak. Market observers emphasize credible, verifiable outcomes as the plan advances.

BlockBeats News, December 20th, World Liberty Financial has put forward a new proposal for WLFI token expenditure, intending to unlock up to 5% of the token supply to drive its U.S. dollar stablecoin USD1 partnership, but the proposal has stirred controversy within the community. Some holders are concerned that the token expenditure may suppress the price and harm the interests of the remaining approximately 80% locked WLFI token holders, while supporters believe that the incentive measures are conducive to the long-term ecosystem value. World Liberty's token sale has previously raised about $550 million for the project, but the WLFI price has dropped by around 60% from its peak. (DL News)