Aave 價格AAVE

Dear @SiloFinance team, Thank you for the detailed response. I appreciate the clarifications on protocol design and legal actions taken. However, several critical concerns remain unaddressed: 1️⃣ DAO Governance vs. Unilateral Decisions You state that Silo operates as a DAO where SILO token holders have voting power over treasury management and protocol decisions . Yet, the decision that "the DAO will not compensate lenders" (Point 7) appears to have been made unilaterally without community vote. On behalf of the community, I request: Formal DAO proposal on @SnapshotLabs presenting multiple options: – Option A: No compensation (current stance) – Option B: Partial treasury-funded compensation (e.g., 25-50% haircut) – Option C: SILO token dilution to create compensation fund – Option D: Revenue-sharing from future protocol fees until affected users are made whole Let SILO token holders decide through governance, not the core team. 2️⃣ Reputation Damage ≠ Legal Liability While I understand Silo's legal position, users will associate the Silo brand with this $60M loss regardless of ToS disclaimers. This is already evident: • TVL down 22% in 5 days ($143.7M → $111.7M) • Affected users will never return without resolution • New users will choose competitors (Aave, Morpho, Compound) with clean track records • Every DeFi community discussion about Silo will mention "the $60M incident" The question isn't "Are we legally liable?" It's "Can Silo survive reputationally without proactive action?" 3️⃣ Weekly Legal Updates You mention legal proceedings have been initiated, and it's very much appreciated. Transparency requires regular updates: • Weekly or bi-weekly public updates on: • Legal proceedings status (filings, responses, court dates) • Negotiations with Stream Finance/Stable Labs • Recovery timeline estimates • Any settlements or repayments received 4️⃣ UI Transparency Hiding affected markets while promoting new vaults creates perception of cover-up, regardless of intent. I strongly advise to: – Restore UI visibility with clear red warning banners: "⚠️ This market is affected by the Stream Finance incident. Withdrawals are currently frozen. [Learn more]" – Dedicated status page showing exact frozen amounts per market, recovery progress, legal action updates 5️⃣ The Permissionless Protocol Paradox You correctly note that Silo's markets are permissionless and immutable. However: • Uniswap doesn't promote specific pools. Users create them independently • Silo actively promoted Managed Vaults through official channels • This creates implied endorsement, even if legally disclaimed If Silo wants to maintain "neutral infrastructure" positioning, it must: • Stop promoting specific vaults/markets • Implement risk ratings (A/B/C/D) for all markets • Require independent audits for any vault featured on official UI *** The DeFi community values protocols that acknowledge mistakes and let governance decide on solutions. Hiding behind terms of service while promoting new products will permanently damage trust. This is your chance to either build a strong community by proactively seeking ways to compensate users or risk destroying your reputation entirely. Assisting affected users will provide long-term value, even if your compensation covers only a fraction of the loss - such as through vested or staked tokens, for example. PS: Appreciate that you reply to my messages publicly, this is a green flag for the entire community.

$AAVE analysis: Price is in a downtrend channel and was rejected from the downtrend line. It needs to hold the local support area; a break below $205 is bearish. It's better to wait for a break of the channel for new entries.

Uniswap, together with major DeFi protocols such as Aave, Curve, Spark, Aragon, Lido, and The Graph, has formed the Ethereum Protocol Advocates Alliance (EPAA) — an organization aimed at: Strengthening collaboration among leading DeFi protocols. Helping governments and regulatory bodies better understand DeFi by promoting transparency and regulatory compliance. Protecting the freedom of DeFi from overly strict regulations that could hinder the growth of decentralized finance. Together, these protocols manage over $100 billion (₦145 trillion) in non-custodial assets — funds that are not held by any company, as every user retains full control of their own wallet and assets circulating within the ecosystem. $BTC $ASTR $ETH $PEPE

$AAVE is showing a clean recovery after testing the 220 support zone. The bullish trendline breakout indicates buyers are gaining control again, supported by rising volume in the DeFi sector. Price structure suggests a move toward 228–230 if momentum continues. Entry Zone: 222.50 – 223.00 Take-Profit (TP): 229.00 Stop-Loss (SL): 220.50 Important Info: The market pumped as traders positioned early for a breakout continuation, following strength across major DeFi tokens. A sustained close above 224 could confirm further upside. #AAVE