Prix de HarryPotterTrumpSonic100InuBTC

You’re absolutely right to be concerned, when two mining pools collectively control more than 51% of Bitcoin's total hashrate, it's a potential centralization red flag that warrants attention. That doesn’t necessarily mean an imminent breach, but it does raise risks. Let’s break it down clearly: 👇👇👇 What’s Actually Going On? Recent reports indicate that Foundry USA and AntPool jointly control around 57% of Bitcoin’s total mining hashrate. These figures and the evolving dynamics have sparked growing concerns about mining centralization. Why Does This Matter? 1. The Risk of a 51% Attack With more than half of the network's computing power, these pools could, in theory: ✓Reorder or censor transactions. ✓Double-spend coins. ✓Manipulate block confirmations to their advantage. In June 2014, GHash.io briefly crossed the 51% threshold, causing panic and a temporary price dip from ~$633 to ~$600. On the Bitcoin Cash network, BTC.com and BTC.top successfully executed a 51% attack in 2019. Other chains like Ethereum Classic and Bitcoin Gold have also suffered such attacks, leading to double-spends. 2. Centralization Undermines Decentralization: Bitcoin was built to be decentralized, but mining centralization undermines that principle. A few large entities controlling a significant portion of the network raises the risk of collusion and regulatory or geopolitical influence. 3. Economic and Governance Implications: If mining power centralizes, these pools could resist or override network upgrades by not adopting new protocol rules. Their actions would overshadow community decisions simply because they control consensus. Is This an Immediate Threat? It's more of a latent threat with high potential rather than an active crisis. Currently, there's no public evidence that Foundry or AntPool are abusing their control or staging an attack. However, the concentration still poses risks, should they ever choose to act maliciously or politically. What Can Be Done? Structural and community responses: ✓Voluntary caps: In the past, GHash.io voluntarily limited its hashrate to below 40% to ease fears. ✓Decentralized mining tools: Solutions like the OCEAN pool aim to redistribute control by empowering miners to choose their own block templates, injecting more autonomy back into the system. ✓Monitoring & transparency: Keeping public scrutiny on pool shares (via Blockchain.com, MiningPoolStats) helps push pools to stay accountable. In summary, Is It a Threat? Yes—potentially. While this isn’t a smoking gun, the fact that two pools command over half of Bitcoin’s hashrate poses a structural risk. It doesn’t guarantee an attack, but it does elevate the stakes. The market, regulators, and the community should remain vigilant to ensure the network stays decentralized and resilient. $BTC $ETH $SOL 📌By Iyusufah 📌 #BitgetInsight #CryptoTrivia

$BTC not done yet though imo If BTC can make a lower low and ETH make a higher low then we are done for reals.

Where the “>$153B” comes from (and why numbers differ) Data vendors show slightly different totals depending on disclosure cut-offs and BTC’s price at the fix. SoSoValue’s current per-fund snapshot (the table I shared) sums to ≈$150.9B across 12 funds. CoinGlass’s dashboard shows total AUM ≈$152.2B and total market cap ≈$153.0B for the U.S. spot BTC ETF set. Bitbo (another widely used tracker) shows ≈$146.5B as of today’s update—again reflecting timing/pricing differences. Translation: on strong BTC days and with late-day updates, the combined value can print above $153B, and on earlier snapshots it will read closer to $150B. Who holds what (market share right now) From the SoSoValue snapshot I used for the table/chart: BlackRock IBIT: ~$87.2B Fidelity FBTC: ~$23.4B Grayscale GBTC: ~$20.9B The top three control ≈87% of all U.S. spot-BTC ETF assets; the top two alone ≈73% (concentration HHI ≈ 3810, which is very high). (These shares come from the table math I showed.) For scale: CoinDesk recently noted IBIT surpassed ~700k BTC and became the fastest ETF to reach ~$80B+ AUM—underscoring how assets are clustering in the biggest, most liquid wrapper. Why assets ballooned to this level Price beta: AUM = flows + price. With BTC printing new highs through mid-2025, the mark-to-market lift alone pushed totals toward/over $150B. (Vendor totals swing with BTC price.) $BTC

BTC UPDATE long signal entry 105000 Target 125000

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Hedge fund manager Anthony Scaramucci says #Bitcoin could still go to $200,000 by end of year 🚀 "Just look at the math. There's way more demand than issued supply of BTC" 🐂