Prix de ZchanZEC

$BTC is poised for a strong 2026, supported by macro easing and rising adoption. While the bigger trend plays out, the Bitget trading club championship has been my main focus. Now in Phase 24, it’s where I’ve sharpened my trading edge. I struggled early on, but things changed once I started using GetAgent to confirm setups and spot opportunities. It’s helped me trade more confidently, especially with tokens like $ZEC, which has shown strong short-term potential. Combining GetAgent insights with consistent strategy has made a clear difference in how I trade and rank.

$ZEC Humanoid_Traders has just published a signal. ZECUSDT Long Entry price: 505 TP price: 520 / 530 SL price: 502.06 7d ROI: 0.00% Click the link to place order with this signal: http://share.bitget.com/copy-trading/white-tg/1391754595246510080?utmSource=SignalCopy&clacCode=4AMS3V3K

$ZEC Elliott Wave Subdivision Analysis 🌊 Macro Context (Daily/Weekly): Wave 1: $160 → $379.56 (Dec 4) — Initial impulse Wave 2: $379.56 → $330.98 (Dec 6) — Corrective pullback Wave 3: $330.98 → $557.56 (Dec 30) — Strong impulsive rally ✅ (longest, most powerful) Wave 4 (Current): $557.56 → $481.82 (Jan 2) — Corrective decline Wave 5 (Projected): $481.82 → ? — Micro-entry zone forming Current Position: We are likely in early Wave 5 of the primary uptrend, with the pullback to $481.82 representing a Wave 4 correction. The recovery to $508.24 suggests Wave 5 initiation. 4H/2H Micro-Subdivision (Wave 3 of 3 Candidate): 4H MACD: DIF (-3.344) deeply negative, HIST (2.167) positive — bullish divergence (MACD turning up despite price weakness) 4H RSI(6): 46.92 — oversold territory, suggesting bounce potential 4H Support: $436.98 (far below current price); immediate support at $502.06 2H MACD: DIF (-0.709) negative but shallow, HIST (0.420) positive — early recovery signal 2H RSI(6): 48.37 — neutral, near midpoint Elliott Wave Micro-Count (4H/2H): The 4H chart shows a 5-wave decline from $544 to $481.82, followed by a 3-wave recovery to $508.24 This recovery pattern suggests we're in Wave A or Wave B of a corrective structure (Zigzag or Flat) Wave 3 of 3 (micro-entry): If the recovery continues, expect a third wave push toward $520–$530 on the 4H, which would represent Wave 3 of the micro-impulse Orderbook Confirmation at Projected Levels 📋 Current Orderbook Imbalance: Bid/Ask Imbalance (5-level): -3.16% (slightly more asks than bids) Bid/Ask Imbalance (10-level): -1.39% (near-balanced) Large Bid Orders: $504.80 (536.525 ZEC), $505.20 (477.287 ZEC) — strong support cluster Large Ask Orders: $511.00 (718.617 ZEC), $509.90 (459.141 ZEC) — resistance cluster Projected Gann Angle Targets: First Target (Wave 3 of 3): $515–$520 — aligns with large ask orders at $511 and Fibonacci 38.2% retracement ($515.86) Second Target (Wave 5 completion): $544–$559 — matches Dec 30 high ($557.56) and Fibonacci 23.6% retracement ($511.95) Support Validation: $504.80–$505.20 bid cluster provides strong orderbook confirmation for bounce support Orderbook Signal: The tight bid/ask imbalance (-1.39% at 10-level) combined with large bids at $504.80 suggests institutional accumulation. This validates the Wave 4 low as a reversal point.$BTC $ETH

$ZEC pulled back from the 536 area and found a strong reaction near the 480–485 support zone. Buyers stepped in aggressively from that level, pushing price back above 500, showing that demand is still active at lower levels. The recovery looks controlled rather than emotional, which is a positive sign for short-term scalps. Right now, ZEC is trading around the 503–505 zone, which is acting as a short-term pivot area. As long as price holds above the 495–490 support region, buyers remain in control and dips can be used for quick long opportunities. The structure is stabilizing after the sharp drop, and momentum is slowly rebuilding. A clean move and hold above 510 can open the door for a push toward the next resistance levels. If price loses 495, we could see a deeper retest toward the previous demand zone, but overall this looks like a bounce phase rather than trend failure.