Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
Cardano Founder Says Crypto’s Quantum Threat Is Overhyped

Cardano Founder Says Crypto’s Quantum Threat Is Overhyped

BeInCryptoBeInCrypto2025/12/08 12:02
By:Mohammad Shahid

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson argues that the quantum threat facing blockchains is overstated today, saying the industry already knows how to build quantum-resistant systems but lacks efficient hardware support to adopt them.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson says quantum threats to blockchain are overstated today. He argues the industry already knows how to build quantum-resistant systems, but lacks efficiency and hardware alignment to switch. 

In a recent podcast discussion, he described quantum as “a big red herring,” adding that real urgency will come only when military-grade quantum benchmarks show credible progress.

Quantum Is a Red Herring For Crypto

Hoskinson explained that blockchains could migrate to quantum-secure cryptography, but the performance trade-off is steep. 

“The protocols to do that are about 10 times slower and 10 times more expensive to run,” Hoskinson said. 

He noted that no network wants to sacrifice throughput for future-proofing, stating, 

“I have a thousand transactions a second. Now I’m going to do a hundred transactions a second, but I’m quantum proof. Nobody wants to be that guy.”

Standards Remain the Gatekeeper

The Cardano founder tied quantum-security delays to standardisation. Until early government guidance landed, the sector risked adopting algorithms that would later be deprecated or unsupported. 

“We had to wait for the US government to write the standards,” he said, referencing FIPS 203–206 under NIST’s post-quantum cryptography program.

Hardware vendors now have direction to build accelerated silicon for approved post-quantum algorithms. 

Hoskinson highlighted why this matters for blockchain performance: “If you pick a non-standard protocol… you’re 100 times slower than the hardware accelerated stuff.” 

He said alignment with NIST ensures both speed and security without locking networks into inefficient cryptography for a decade.

Quantum computing and blockchains: Let's match the urgency with the actual threats.But first, where are we on timelines to an cryptographically relevant quantum computer?Lately, the timelines are being overstated — leading to calls for urgent, wholesale transitions to…

— a16z crypto (@a16zcrypto) December 5, 2025

This marks a turning point. Post-quantum standards exist, and the U. government has begun adoption. 

Large infrastructure players such as Cloudflare have already integrated PQ key exchange into mainstream traffic. It signals that migration pressure is slowly building across internet security stacks.

The Quantum Risk To Crypto Is Timed, Not Immediate

Hoskinson’s framing mirrors wider sentiment across cryptography research. Quantum threats to blockchain signatures are real but not current. 

Researchers and financial-security analysts still view CRQC-level systems as a 2030s-era event rather than a present hazard. Risk stems from when to migrate, not whether.

That window now has a reference clock. “DARPA has a program called QBI, the Quantum Blockchain Initiative,” Hoskinson said. 

According to him, the program is evaluating 11 companies to determine if practical quantum computers can exist at scale by 2033. 

He called QBI the clearest public benchmark for journalists tracking progress, adding,

“The military needs to know — when do we upgrade our crypto and how do we do that?”

Recent moves support his caution. While quantum research continues — from topological qubit work like Microsoft’s Majorana-based devices to large-scale PQ rollouts in communications infrastructure — no evidence suggests imminent cryptographic collapse. 

Post-quantum migration continues, but cost, latency, and ecosystem fragmentation remain barriers for blockchains.

Why It Matters

Hoskinson’s comments cut through a debate often driven by speculation rather than engineering data. Quantum-safe blockchain design exists, but activating it prematurely slows networks, raises transaction costs, and fragments developer tooling. 

With NIST standards finalised and hardware roadmaps forming, networks are moving toward planning, not panic.

Most experts believe the shift will land in the next decade. Hoskinson echoed that view: 

“Most smart people think there’s a strong possibility we’ll have something in the 2030s.” 

Until then, efficiency, competition, and hardware-acceleration support will dictate when blockchains flip the switch to quantum-proof cryptography.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

Solana's Latest Steep Drop: An In-Depth Analysis of Security Flaws and Governance Challenges Facing Fast Smart Contract Networks

- Solana's SOL token plummeted below $165 in late 2025 amid heightened bearish sentiment and systemic risks. - Network vulnerabilities including a $36M Upbit hack, 68% validator node decline, and cryptographic flaws eroded investor confidence. - Governance dysfunction marked by stalled DAOs, delayed security patches, and inactive protocols (75% of 264) hindered crisis response. - Market fundamentals weakened with 20% TVL drop, 16% fee decline, and ETF outflows despite temporary DEX volume spikes. - Institu

Bitget-RWA2025/12/10 17:02
Solana's Latest Steep Drop: An In-Depth Analysis of Security Flaws and Governance Challenges Facing Fast Smart Contract Networks

Bitcoin Leverage Liquidation: Does It Pose a Systemic Threat to Retail Crypto Investors?

- October 2025's Bitcoin crash triggered $19B in leveraged liquidations, exposing crypto derivatives' fragility amid extreme retail leverage and thin liquidity. - High leverage (up to 1,001:1) and perpetual futures dominated by platforms like Hyperliquid amplified volatility, creating self-reinforcing downward spirals. - Behavioral biases (FOMO, overconfidence) and social media echo chambers drove irrational leveraged bets, while regulators paused risky ETFs and warned of systemic risks. - The crisis highl

Bitget-RWA2025/12/10 16:34
Bitcoin Leverage Liquidation: Does It Pose a Systemic Threat to Retail Crypto Investors?
© 2025 Bitget