Unacademy’s founder reveals that the startup’s valuation has dropped below $500M and acknowledges ongoing merger and acquisition discussions
Unacademy Faces Major Valuation Drop Amid Industry Shifts
Unacademy, once a leading name in India’s edtech sector, has seen its valuation plummet to under $500 million—a dramatic 85% decrease from its peak during the pandemic. The company is currently considering mergers and acquisitions as it navigates this challenging period.
On the occasion of Unacademy’s 10th anniversary, CEO Gaurav Munjal shared in a detailed message on X that the company’s worth has sharply declined from its $3.5 billion high three years ago. He also acknowledged ongoing discussions regarding potential mergers or acquisitions.
Changing Fortunes in India’s Edtech Industry
The edtech boom in India, fueled by pandemic lockdowns, has faded as students return to traditional classrooms. During the pandemic, companies like Unacademy and Byju’s attracted massive investments and expanded rapidly. However, this growth stalled once in-person learning resumed, leading to significant setbacks for the sector.
Byju’s, which was India’s most valuable startup not long ago, has seen its valuation collapse to nearly nothing and entered insolvency proceedings in September of last year. In addition, a U.S. bankruptcy court ordered founder Byju Raveendran to pay over $1.07 billion for failing to comply with court orders and providing incomplete information about a $533 million transfer by the company’s U.S. branch that was never recovered.
In contrast, Physics Wallah, once considered an underdog, has achieved profitability and continued to grow, recently making a successful debut on the public market.
Unacademy’s Internal Struggles and Market Challenges
Munjal reflected that the past three years have been the most difficult for Unacademy’s founders, marked by declining demand, fierce competition, and internal upheaval. The company faced losses and was forced to abandon its ambitious expansion plans.
“For us founders, these last three years have been the toughest we’ve ever experienced. Until 2021, we hadn’t seen a single month of negative growth,” Munjal wrote. “But recently, we’ve watched our market share slip away in a field we helped create, and it’s been painful.”
He attributes the downturn to rapid changes in the market after the pandemic, with students returning to offline education and competitors introducing more affordable products inspired by Unacademy’s original approach. As a result, Unacademy struggled to maintain demand and growth.
“We became complacent,” Munjal admitted, noting that the company failed to adjust its pricing strategy while rivals offered lower-cost alternatives.
Leadership Focus Shifts and Investor Concerns
Recently, Munjal has shifted much of his attention to AirLearn, a new AI-powered language learning app modeled after Duolingo’s gamified style. This move has reportedly caused tension with some Unacademy investors, who worry that the core edtech business is being neglected during a critical time.
Funding History and Cost-Cutting Measures
Since its founding in 2015, Unacademy has secured roughly $854.3 million across 13 funding rounds, with major investors including SoftBank, Tiger Global, General Atlantic, and Peak XV Partners.
Munjal stated that over the past two years, Unacademy has undergone significant restructuring, reducing its annual spending from ₹14 billion (about $155.7 million) in 2022 to under ₹1.75 billion (around $19.5 million) this year. The company has implemented layoffs, cut back on marketing, and renewed its focus on its main subscription offerings.
There have also been recent reports that competitor UpGrad has explored acquiring Unacademy for a price between $300 million and $400 million.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
PENGU Experiences a Sharp 40% Price Decline: Is This a Sign of Trouble or the Perfect Time to Invest?
- Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) dropped 40% due to liquidity outflows, regulatory fears, and weak technical indicators. - Investors debate if this reflects systemic altcoin fragility or a mispricing opportunity for value buyers. - Long-term potential hinges on partnerships, ETF prospects, and macroeconomic/regulatory clarity despite supply risks. - Behavioral biases and social media-driven sentiment amplify volatility, creating both panic and speculative cycles. - Strategic buyers must weigh ecosystem execution a
PENGU Token Technical Review: Managing Brief Price Fluctuations and Shifts in Momentum
- PENGU token's November 2025 analysis shows conflicting bearish RSI divergence and bullish MACD/OBV momentum. - Compressed Bollinger Bands ($0.00951-$0.0136) and low ATR signal potential breakout risks above $0.0235 resistance. - Whale accumulation ($9.4M) and ETF approval prospects contrast with $7.68M short positions and macroeconomic headwinds. - Mixed candlestick patterns and $273K institutional inflows suggest short-term reversal risks amid fragile market equilibrium.

HYPE Token Experiences Rapid Growth: Could This Signal the Emergence of a Fresh Crypto Trend?
- HYPE token surged to $41.28 driven by speculation, ecosystem growth, and institutional interest. - November 29 unlock released 9.92M tokens but saw only 23.4% sold, with 40% re-staked, showing strong internal confidence. - Protocol upgrades (HIP-3) boosted trading volume by 15%, while HyperEVM and HyperCore expanded DeFi utility beyond futures trading. - Institutional backing from BlackRock/Stripe and $581M Paradigm stake contrasts with $410M potential sell pressure from future unlocks. - Token's long-te

The ChainOpera AI Token Crash: A Warning Story for AI-Based Cryptocurrency Initiatives Facing Regulatory and Market Challenges
- COAI token's 90% collapse highlights risks of centralized governance and unregulated AI in crypto. - Regulatory ambiguity under the CLARITY Act exacerbated volatility and investor uncertainty. - Unaudited AI algorithms and lack of stress-testing mirrored past financial crises, prompting calls for global oversight. - Investors now prioritize decentralized, auditable projects amid lessons from COAI's implosion.
