Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert & block trade
Convert crypto with one click and zero fees
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
Margin Squeeze and Forecasting Markets Lead to Rating Cuts Amid Volatile Sports Betting Industry

Margin Squeeze and Forecasting Markets Lead to Rating Cuts Amid Volatile Sports Betting Industry

Bitget-RWA2025/11/06 19:52
By:Bitget-RWA

- Bank of America analyst Shaun Kelley downgraded DraftKings and Flutter to "Neutral," citing margin compression, rising taxes, and prediction market threats. - DraftKings shares fell 6.4% to a two-year low while Flutter dropped 3.9% as structural hold erosion and regulatory risks intensified. - Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket challenge traditional sportsbooks with lower fees, prompting DraftKings and FanDuel to launch competing platforms. - Regulatory uncertainty and tax pressures could cost

Bank of America’s recent decision to lower its ratings on

(DKNG) and Entertainment (FLUT), which owns FanDuel, has sent shockwaves through the sports betting sector. This move reflects mounting worries about unstable profit margins, increasing regulatory challenges, and the disruptive growth of prediction markets. Analyst Shaun Kelley led the downgrade, shifting both companies from "Buy" to "Neutral" and reducing their price targets to $35 for DraftKings and $250 for Flutter. Following the news, both stocks experienced significant declines—DraftKings dropped 6.4% to its lowest point in two years, while Flutter fell 3.9%, according to .

Kelley’s analysis described the industry as facing a “perfect storm” of obstacles. The sector’s structural hold—the share of bets kept as revenue after payouts—has weakened as favorable sports results have led to higher winnings for bettors. This squeeze on margins is further intensified by rising state taxes, such as the recent hike in Illinois, and tighter regulations, especially in the UK where Flutter operates,

reported. Kelley cautioned that these headwinds could persist until 2026, with states possibly raising taxes again to make up for revenue lost to the fast-growing prediction market segment.

Prediction markets, which enable bets on everything from political races to economic trends, are increasingly seen as a real challenge to traditional sportsbooks. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have secured major collaborations, including partnerships with the NHL and ICE, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, according to

. These platforms offer lower fees and flexible pricing, drawing betting activity away from established operators. In response, DraftKings has acquired Railbird Technologies, a prediction market platform regulated by the CFTC, while FanDuel has teamed up with CME Group to introduce its own event contracts, reported. Still, Kelley pointed out that regulatory ambiguity—some states have warned that prediction markets could threaten gaming licenses—adds further complications to these initiatives.

The downgrades also highlight wider industry difficulties. DraftKings’ share of the U.S. online casino market has slipped from 27% to 23% over the past two years, and Flutter’s betting volume growth has slowed to 5% so far this year, according to

. Despite these setbacks, both companies continue to be major forces in the market. DraftKings recently landed a prominent deal with ESPN, becoming the network’s “exclusive Official Sportsbook and Odds Provider,” a partnership that could boost its profile ahead of its third-quarter earnings, noted.

Experts warn that the road ahead will be challenging. Kelley projects that DraftKings could see a $150 million EBITDA reduction in the third and fourth quarters due to shrinking margins and investments in prediction markets, with Flutter facing similar issues. As tax pressures mount and prediction markets expand, the industry’s “structural hold” may not be as reliable as before, NewsNet5 reported. For now, DraftKings and Flutter are adjusting, but the evolving environment suggests a lengthy period of managing margins and navigating regulations is likely on the horizon.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

Tharimmune’s $545 Million Initiative Speeds Up Blockchain Integration Among Institutions

- Tharimmune raised $545M via private placement led by DRW/Liberty City to build a Canton Coin treasury and develop institutional blockchain applications. - Funds will acquire Canton Coins, operate Super Validator nodes, and expand the Canton Network connecting Goldman Sachs , BNP Paribas, and DTCC. - Stock surged 120% post-announcement as Canton Foundation's first public investment and institutional backing from Deutsche Bank/HSBC highlight blockchain adoption trends. - Strategic leadership changes and $3

Bitget-RWA2025/11/06 21:52
Tharimmune’s $545 Million Initiative Speeds Up Blockchain Integration Among Institutions

XRP News Today: Institutions Show Confidence in Ripple's Blockchain Ambitions Even as XRP Remains Unstable

- Ripple’s $40B valuation from a low-participation buyback reflects investor confidence in its regulatory clarity and expansion. - Partnerships with Mastercard and WebBank on RLUSD settlements highlight Ripple’s institutional credibility and blockchain innovation. - XRP faces short-term volatility, with analysts warning of potential 10% declines but some predicting 600% long-term outperformance over Bitcoin . - Strategic asset retention and ecosystem growth position Ripple as a key player in reshaping cryp

Bitget-RWA2025/11/06 21:52
XRP News Today: Institutions Show Confidence in Ripple's Blockchain Ambitions Even as XRP Remains Unstable

DeFi Faces Stability Challenge: USDX Redemption Issues Reveal Underlying Systemic Risks

- Whale investor 0xe454 spent $800,000 to buy 933,241 USDX tokens during its 2025 depeg to $0.3887, betting on recovery. - Redemption delays for both recent and prior 1.4M USDX purchases raised concerns over protocol stability and liquidity risks. - Lista DAO's emergency vote (LIP 022) aims to liquidate USDX positions amid 800% borrowing rates, mirroring 2025 xUSD collapse risks. - Experts warn cross-collateralized DeFi structures amplify systemic risks, urging stronger collateral diversification to preven

Bitget-RWA2025/11/06 21:34
DeFi Faces Stability Challenge: USDX Redemption Issues Reveal Underlying Systemic Risks

Fed’s QE Strategy: Could AI Mania Lead to a Repeat of the 1999 Bubble?

- Billionaire Ray Dalio warns Fed's shift to QE risks inflating an AI-driven bubble akin to 1999's dot-com crash. - He criticizes reinvesting MBS proceeds into Treasury bills as monetizing debt while cutting rates amid large fiscal deficits. - Analysts highlight risks of reduced T-bill supply, lower yields, and repo market strains from Fed's $15B/month Treasury demand. - AI sector valuations and corporate earnings will test Dalio's concerns as November inflation data and PMI reports approach.

Bitget-RWA2025/11/06 21:14
Fed’s QE Strategy: Could AI Mania Lead to a Repeat of the 1999 Bubble?